Animal Farm “featured at number 31 on the Modern Library List of Best 20th-Century Novels.” Yep, and I’ve bought a graphic version of it. One reviewer says it’s the first graphical version, but that’s not true – Ralph Steadman did a version in 1995. Says something of the power of the book, that I remember bits that aren’t featured in this version – e.g. the return of religion through the crow. The story remains unbearably sad, or depressing. – Mind you, could do with George Orwell now, to write about Trump and Johnson; or maybe the nature of financial markets.
Seen a few Vlogs on Nottingham now, and a number of its viewers have said this one is worth watching. Of course, I’m sensitive to what is missed – the radical history of Nottingham, its sports history, the night life (tens of thousands at the weekends), the cultural offer – and the repaired building featured is better known as the offices of our best ever architect. If given the chance, might have recommended other restaurants. Not allowed to film in some of our attractions, where the tours are a key part of their business, but photo presentation was a good substitute.
Ran into this 3 part video history series after seeing a travel vlog. Written and presented by Michael, of Nottsflix, and published in 2018 and 2019, this is a pretty impressive effort if, as claimed, this was his first attempt. It tries to be light-hearted. I’m not an historian so can’t know is everything is right, but it seemed pretty compelling to me. A history of the Broadmarsh shopping centre, starting with what Broad Marsh itself was, how it was known to be a monastery, how it was taken over for various trades, how living conditions came to be so intolerable despite the wealth being generated in the city, why the shopping centre came about and why it has the brutalist architecture (albeit, 3rd wave, muted brutalist architecture). Michael has also found letters from the protestors against the shopping centre being built, although seems a little unclear as why the council was so keen (suggesting something dark and underhand). Not sure. One of the losses that at one stage the early and much more ambitious proposals for regeneration wanted to re-instate was the previous city streets plan for that area (although that was also compromised by Maid Marian Way. That optimistic time was first publicly promoted I think in 1997, but the scale of the proposals was huge, and the then owner Westfield, had other projects, e.g. Derby’s shopping centre, that were easier to do and so done first.
It seems much more likely now that the football season cannot be completed. So how to decide the outcomes? By discussion and negotiation it seems. Unprecedented. Subject to legal challenge! Yet a finish has to be negotiated. Otherwise Liverpool have to be told they were not the champions of the current top tier despite their brilliant season. OK, “Leeds were due to fall apart again before the end of the season as normal”! Joke. If you apply the principle of deciding by points per game, enabling the return to normal size leagues to make up for the loss of Bury, and not allocating the play-off places, a reasonable set of outcomes drop into place. (Play-offs kinda run against the grain of football justice in the first place, but the competition for those extra places happened to have been very close this season.) So these are my recommendations –
\Premiership – Liverpool; Relegated- Norwich, then Aston Villa; Champions – Leeds and promoted – West Brom; Relegated Luton, Barnsley; League 1 champions – Coventry, promoted Rotherham; Relegated – Southend and Bolton; League 2 champions – Crewe & Swindon as joint champions, promoted Plymouth; Relegated – Stevenage; National League Champions – Barrow; promoted Harrogate. (Note – this is based on a posting in Facebook I made on 2nd April.)
This is harshest on Aston Villa, cos they had a game in hand – the most debatable of all the calls. (One analysis of predicted results suggests Bournemouth would fall below them.) (And maybe Swindon would be declared Champions – it’s just that they’re currently 2nd.) (I also wonder if prizes for place finishes need to be evened up given the uncertainties of where clubs might have finished.)
And perhaps the FA Cup can be finished as a pre-season tournament … FA Cup 2019-20 – Quarter-Final Draw Sheffield United vs. Arsenal Newcastle United vs. Manchester City Norwich City vs. Manchester United. Leicester City vs. Chelsea
Released on Youtube by Michael Moore of the 50th Earth Day, this very critical film against much of the modern environmental movement is welcomed by the Guardian reviewer as a “contrarian eco-doc“, but heavily attacked by others such as “Films for Action” and “The Energy Mix“. I too, am critical, but found some of the stories very salutary. (Wiki.)
An American mirror array in a desert to heat water that now lies in tatters, having wrecked acres of desert surface (which nowadays we know does have a distinctive eco-system). Concerts put on for green causes that (despite claims) doesn’t have the power to run the whole event and relies on the un-green grid for top-up and back-up power. Materials to create solar panels (they’re not made from glass) and batteries for cars draw heavily on mineral mining too. Electric cars often rely on coal-powered power stations. Wind farms that do indeed have a lifetime and can end up idle, rotting and ugly. That burning bio-mass releases CO2 and some of the woods and forests being cleared are special environments, which one scene at the end shows, provides homes for Orang-Utans. Some of the firms involved in the new green sectors have been the big players in the dirty or grey sectors.
It is worth reading the articles that are critical of the film highlighted above. Off the top criticisms I’d make include – – the documentary does not explore ground source heat pumping; or anaerobic digestion; or waste incineration; – waste incineration often sees metal extraction for re-cycling and ranks higher in the pyramid than burial; and it adds value despite needing to be under-written by gas or wood-chip burning at source; and heating devices running off the grid in the homes; – people need to be supplied with comfort (heating and cooling), and a first step for this should be the design of the buildings they live in or use; and planning and location is key to reducing travel; (agglomeration); – not all natural; gas comes from grand extraction and not all bio-mass fuels are based on burning; check out Nottingham City Transport’s use of cell-cracking technology.
Loads more to be said from the documentary and in critique of it. The documentary is a missed opportunity to convey what can be done and reflects badly on Michael Moore and those associated with it (both for inaccuracy and missing the bigger story) But it does provide a few jolts to make you think a bit more.
I enjoyed ITV’s Quiz tv series very much. Michael Sheen as Chris Tarrant is very entertaining. It is made clear that the Major’s brother-in-law tried to help the Major cheat, that the Major trained, and that the Major’s wife sought to enrol the help of one of the second night’s final 10. But the drama does suggest that the Major’s learning for the event was extensive and that he may have relied heavily on the audience’s reaction to help answer some of the questions. And that the drive came from pride, wanting to do well for his wife and to offer relief to his debt-ridden brother-in-law. The show’s creators did present an edited tape and gained out of the subsequent coverage. Chris Tarrant says the Major was a “rotter” but the show sees his character ask the Major through the TV screen whether the had cheated. The drama does suggest that the guilty conviction was not safe.