“I, Daniel Blake” showing in The Meadows

Showing at Bridgeway Hall, at the shopping centre, tonight at 6pm; free admission.
Ken Loach’s welfare state polemic is blunt, dignified and brutally moving” – The Guardian.
I Daniel Blake 2717
Showing financed by Nottingham City Council, because we are fed up withe the harshness of the DWP system, and because the film draws upon real events that took place in Nottingham.
Lilian Greenwood MP will open proceedings, supported by Martyn Neal, senior worker at Meadows Advice Group.
Support will be available for people who need help.

Thanks for making the event happen to – Meadows Advice Group, One Stop Shop, Meadows Partnership Trust, St.Saviour’s SouperKitchen, NeMTRA,  Bridgeway Hall and Dave Shaw.

In November I asked a question at full Council –
“I understand that research for the film, ‘I, Daniel Blake’ was conducted in St Ann’s and the film highlights the shortfalls of the welfare system.
“How fit for purpose does the Portfolio Holder think the welfare system is?
Councillor Graham Chapman replied as follows:
If you want a brief answer, it isn’t, but allow me to elaborate.
‘I, Daniel Blake’ is about the injustices and cruelty of the benefits system, in particular the system of sanctions implemented under this and the previous coalition government. Rarely do statistics speak for themselves, but in this case they do. The latest statistics for Nottingham on sanctions since the regime was put in place in 2012, for Jobseekers Allowance there have been 34,200 referral sanctions in the city under the new JSA sanctions regime.
In only 14,700 cases was there a final decision to apply to sanction, that’s 43%. Of the 14,700 decisions, 5,200 went through the appeals process and of these, 3,200 decisions were overturned. In short, only 1 in 5 of all original decisions to apply sanctions were upheld and only 1 in 16 of referrals were upheld and many of those would not have been legitimate because many people would have been too demoralised to appeal – and we all know people who would not have appealed, even though they had a just case.
So, you’re down to 1 in 16, and in my view it’s probably 1 in 20 or 1 in 30. As for Employment Seekers Allowance the numbers are much smaller, nearly 2,000 original referrals since December 2012 and only 400 decisions were taken in impose sanctions, that’s 1 in 5. Of these, 150 were overturned which means that only 1 in 8 people were actually sanctioned.
The significance of this is that the whole infrastructure has been developed, taking up the time of thousands of officials, of assessors, adjudicators, food bank volunteers and benefit advisors, to help implement and pick up the pieces of a system that is grossly inadequate and incompetent. Worst still, this has inflicted misery on whole groups of people, some mentally ill who did not deserve it. Further still, it has forced a lot of hard working civil servants against their will to become people who sanction rather than support. This too, was well illustrated by the film. Nor should anyone believe that this exercise has been driven principally by the need to save money because it has probably cost far more than it has saved. It is to do with punishment and indiscriminate punishment at that. It derives from a view that people on benefits are fundamentally ‘scrounging’ – that they are taking money from others. It is a tabloid view of the world which now seems to dominate certain parts.
It forgets that large numbers, like Daniel Blake, have paid into the system for many years, large numbers are children, like the children in the film who are caught up in ‘punishment’. It forgets that most benefits go to people already in work but in low paid jobs, but none of that counts when you are looking for scapegoats for a crashed financial system. Actually, it is a class issue – some very well-off people caused the crash, but on the whole it has been lots of not very well-off people who have paid for the consequences. Compared with the brutality applied of the benefits sanctions system, the approach to tax evasion, to syphoning off pension funds has been kid glove and in some cases, some people have even been awarded with honours.
Which brings me on to the phrase which encapsulated a lot of this attitude and that phrase is ‘something for nothing’ – how many times have we heard that phrase from the papers and from a certain Mr George Osborne MP? This phrase means that if you are a wealthy newspaper owner living abroad and paying virtually no taxes or if you are the son of a wealthy family benefitting from inherited, unearned income and a place at a Westminster school, which you certainly didn’t pay for by doing a paper round then you are a respectable member of society, even though you are getting a great deal for not a lot. If you are Wayne, living on the Aspley estate, with no chance of inheritance or any of the privileges it can buy then, somehow, you are a ‘scrounger’ and so are all of the other people on benefits.
That is the attitude which has driven the UK state, which I am very proud of, into punishing hundreds of thousands of decent, vulnerable and poor citizens in pursuit of a minority who are defrauding, and to concentrate on these mainly innocent people at the expense of concentrating on where the real money is, such as tax evasion from a number of large corporations and tax evasion from a number of very rich individuals, many of whom are associated with the Conservative Party. This, too, is an implicit lesson of ‘I, Daniel Blake’.

Advertisements

Looking forward to March 2017

20170301-calendar-bb0385h

Expecting the new phases of residents parking permits to kick in this month:
– permits should be with residents by 10th March;
– from 10th March, warning notices will be issued to any contravening vehicle for the following 2 weeks; after this date, Penalty Charge Notices will be issued.

Hoping for play equipment to be installed on The Green this month.

“I, Daniel Blake”
– to be shown at Bridgeway Hall on 30th March, meet at 6:30 for 7pm;
– free food for clients of Meadows Advice Group, Clifton Advice Centre and One Stop Shop, but please book (otherwise £5 adults, half price for others);
– Introduction by Lilian Greenwood MP;
– hosted by Meadows Advice Group and Councillors Heaton and Edwards;
– showing of an award winning film that portraying the experiences of DWP that people can suffer, including drawing on events that happened in Nottingham;
– E-mail – meadows_advice@btconnect.com, or phone 01159860197.

BTW, new Bio-City extension lights up at 6pm on 9th March.

Bridge branch Labour Party – February 2017

wp_20170214_19_57_44_pro-qwcc-bblp-cllrgc-g-cllrnh-d-aa0359h
Councillor Graham Chapman explains that the City Council now spends £96 million per annum on adult care compared to £9 million on bins and waste collection.
Adult care is where the crisis is developing.  We’re living longer, people with  disabilities are living longer, and the living wage – applauded – has meant adult care services are becoming more expensive.
Government support for local government has been directed away from those authorities serving those most in need.  And yet special deals are done for  Surrey County Council, both in previous years, and now this year, as a local referendum for a 15% increase in their Council tax this year.
The NHS has struggeled too cos it’s not geting the real terms increases it was getting, bu also because cuts to council services isnonsense when caring for someone at home costs c. £500 per week, whilst care in a hospital costs c. £2000 per week.
And councils like Northants are in trouble cos they took all the one-off deals from national gov’t to keep Council tax down and now find they haven’t got the tax base they need for services.
So Nottingham will increase the Council tax by 2% and nd the furteher 3% recommened by the national governemt for adult care.
There is also a lot going on in seeking extra revenue from running services for others, reduce the proprtion of spend on overheads.
Meanwhile, the national gov’t should reverse the cuts in Corporation tax, cos it’s only going out in dividends, whilst an increased tax would incentivise mre investment.
TO BE PROOFED and UPDATED.

Full council November 2016

Buses & municipal enterprises, “I, Daniel Blake”, Midland Main Line, pharmacies, and garden waste recycling featured.

Buses & municipal enterprises.
A motion condemning clause 21 of the Buses bill, which the council remains concerned might still impact on our ownership of Nottingham City Transport.
And we reminded Nottingham Conservatives that they would have sold NCT off.
Brian Parbutt celebrated the drive within NCT that meant bus travel use grew from 2001 on as the company decided to focus on growing their custom.
Even if Nottingham isn’t affected directly, we’d like the ability of councils to own bus companies elsewhere.  When standing for South Derbyshire, I was disappointed with Arriva.
What’s weird is that with the municipal bus companies showing the way, you’d want to make it against the law.
I, Daniel Blake
I raised the film with a question cos Nottingham people had helped do the research for the movie; and asked about the effectiveness of our social security system.
Graham Chapman declared the system was not fit for purpose.
34,200 in Nottingham seeking Jobseekers Allowance had been sanctioned.  2,000 seeking ESA sanctioned.
Only a small fraction of the decisions upheld after the full process.
Particular concern for people who are mentally ill.
img_4281dc0299h-wp_20161114_15_33_26_pro
Pharmacies motion.
Concern about a 6% budget cut to pharmacies based in the community.
Midland Main Line.
I wrote a question highlighting the lack of assurance, given over a promise to electrify the line by 2023, when sought in the House of Commons last week.
Recycling.
The Conservatives recycled a question about garden waste not being collected for recycling from November to March inclusive.
The answer remains the same too – previously the 5 months collections only accounted for 18% of the waste at a cost of £70,000 extra per month.
The cut was made in the 2011 budget, and the cuts in government support have increased since – with a £25 million cut expected next year.
Meanwhile, (from memory), Nottingham Conservatives have not moved an amendment to re-instate the service in the 5 budgets since 2011
.

I, Daniel Blake

daniel-blake
Surely, it was “Coronation Street“‘s purpose, or even “Eastenders“‘, to tell the story of ordinary people facing extraordinary pressures, because our benefits system is not the vision for social security we once had.
A 100 minutes film format for portraying the crises in 4 lives in a way that doesn’t over simplify is a big challenge:-
– a carpenter with no perception of how a computer mouse might be used;
– an employer who spends ages picking someone out and then crudely drops the offer;
– failing to show the potential of using an Advice Group (or even checking with an MP);
– DWP staff who work to a system in an automaton way;
– even the out of date response to a victim of a heart-attack.
If these criticisms seem harsh,  then OK, but it’s what happens when you choose a shorter format.
Alan Bleasdale’s “Men from the Blackstuff” in the early eighties was far better, but it had 6 episodes, and a determination to show the values and culture of the organised labour movement.
I have to say, as challenging as the JSA system could be – or as the film suggests, pointless – my experience of staff attitude (and ‘rigour’) was different (if possibly 5 years out of date).
WP_20161027_19_12_03_Pro.jpg
I’ve seen people celebrate the film as a campaigning tool, and Broadway’s screen 3 was fully booked twice today – people were asked in the spirit of solidarity to not take up empty seats with their coats – so I get that others see the film far more positively than I do, including cinema-goers (see above) and reviewers (Guardian, Little White Lies).
In the meantime, if you have a problem with money, seek advice beyond DWP.